Matthew Arnold’s Views on Poetry in "Study of Poetry"




Exploring Matthew Arnold's Perspectives on Poetry: A Study of Poetic Expression Literary Criticism as Found in  His Essay “The Study of Poetry.”

Introduction

Matthew Arnold, a prominent Victorian poet and critic, held a significant influence on the development of English poetry. In his essay "Study of Poetry," Arnold expounded upon his views regarding various aspects of poetry. This article will delve into six key elements of Arnold's perspective on poetry: his emphasis on action, the subject of poetry, manner and style, the Ancients as safe models, the Grand style, and his understanding of the function and definition of poetry.

Stress on Action

Matthew Arnold begins his ‘Preface to Poems’ 1853, by saying that he dropped his poem Empedocles on Etna from the new collection, because it had very little action. The hero suffered and brooded over his suffering and committed suicide. Mere subjectivity, the inner gloom or melancholy of the poet to the neglect of action, can never result in true poetry. Poetry of the highest order requires suitable action an action sufficiently serious and weighty. Poetry is dedicated to joy and this joy results from the magnificence of its action (reminds of Aristotle’s stress on action as the soul of tragedy).

Thus, Matthew Arnold believed that poetry should emphasize action rather than mere description. He argued that poetry should strive to capture the dynamism of life and engage the reader through its vivid portrayal of human experiences. According to Arnold, the most powerful poetry arises from the depiction of significant actions that reveal the complexities of the human condition.

Subject of Poetry 

Arnold maintained that poetry should primarily focus on portraying the deeper aspects of human existence. He believed that the highest form of poetry explores universal themes such as love, beauty, death, and the human spirit. Arnold emphasized the importance of poetry as a means to address profound questions and evoke emotional responses that transcend the ordinary. 

Only those should be taken as subjects of poetry which can impart the highest pleasure. Arnold points out that it is not necessary for modern poets to choose modern subjects as in the modern age there is too much of philistinism and vulgarization of values. The poets should choose ancient subjects, those which were chosen by Homer and the other Greek Masters .In short, poets should choose actions that please always and please all. Actions that are of this nature ‘most powerfully appeal to those elementary feelings which are independent of time’ and hence are the fittest subjects for poetry. It is immaterial whether such subjects are ancient or modern so long as they fulfill this principle. But an age wanting in moral grandeur, says Arnold with reference to his age, can hardly supply such subjects, and so the poets must turn to ancient themes.
In his essay, Arnold advocated for a style of poetry characterized by clarity, precision, and simplicity. He believed that excessive ornamentation and overindulgence in figurative language could hinder the genuine expression of ideas. Arnold preferred a poetic style that conveyed meaning effectively and resonated with the reader's sensibilities.

Highest poetry and highest poetic pleasure result from the whole and not from separate parts, from the harmony of matter and manner and not from manner alone. No unworthy subject can be made delightful by an excellent treatment. Arnold says that with the Greeks the action was the first consideration, with us, attention is fixed mainly on the value of individual thoughts and images. They regarded the whole, we regard the parts. Greeks were also the highest model of expression, the masters of the grand style. That was because they kept the expression simple and subordinated to the action, and because they expression drew its force directly from the action.

The Ancients as safe models

Arnold viewed the poetry of the Ancients, particularly the Greek and Roman poets, as models of excellence. He saw their works as embodying the principles of harmony, order, and balance. According to Arnold, the Ancients possessed a sense of measure and restraint that modern poets could learn from, enabling them to produce enduring and meaningful poetry.

According to Arnold, the ancients are the perfect guides or models to be followed by the poets. Shakespeare is not a safe guide, for although he has excellence of subject, he is unable to say a thing plainly even when the action demands direct expression. From the ancients, the poet will learn how superior is the effect of one moral impression left by a great action treated as a whole to the effect produced by the most striking single thought.

The Grand style

Arnold acknowledged the significance of the "grand style" in poetry. He valued poems that exhibited elevated language, sublime imagery, and a majestic tone. The grand style, in Arnold's view, conveyed a sense of nobility and awe, invoking deep emotions and imparting a lasting impression on the reader. 

Arnold says that the ancients were the masters of the ‘grand style’. The grand style arises in poetry when ‘a noble nature, poetically gifted treats with simplicity or severity, a serious subject’. So, for the grand style, there must be 1) nobility of soul 2) subject or action chosen must be serious enough 3) the treatment should be severe or simple. Homer, Dante and Milton were masters of it, but most English poets lacked it. Modern poets like Keats do not have the shaping power, they have short passages of excellence but not the beauty of the whole. In Arnold’s view, only poetry modeled on the Ancients can serve as an antidote to philistinism. Arnold’s theory of poetry is to be understood as a counterblast to romantic individualism, subjectivity, and contempt of authority.

Function/definition of poetry

Arnold is confident that poetry has a great future. It is in poetry that our race will find an ever surer stay. Poetry according to Arnold, is capable of higher uses, interpreting life for us, consoling us, and sustaining us, that is, poetry will replace religion and philosophy.

For Matthew Arnold, the primary function of poetry was to provide consolation and solace amidst the challenges of life. He believed that poetry had a vital role in elevating the human spirit, fostering moral and spiritual growth, and offering a respite from the tumultuous realities of the world. Arnold saw poetry as a source of enlightenment and a means to cultivate a higher understanding of oneself and the world.

Arnold further declares that ‘poetry is a criticism of life under conditions fixed for such a criticism by laws of poetic truth and poetic beauty, the spirit of our age will find…as time goes on, and other helps fail, its consolation and stay.’ Poetry as a criticism of life: Arnold explains criticism of life as the application of noble and profound ideas to life, and ‘laws of poetic truth and beauty’ as ‘truth and seriousness of matter’ and ‘felicity and perfection of diction and manner’ Arnold believes that poetry does not represent life as it is, rather the poet adds something to it from his own noble nature and this contributes to his criticism of life. Poetry makes men moral, better and nobler, not by direct teaching but by appealing to the soul, to the whole of man.

Conclusion 

Matthew Arnold's views on poetry, as expressed in his "Study of Poetry," encompassed various aspects ranging from the emphasis on action and the subject matter to the importance of manner and style. Arnold's admiration for the Ancients and his understanding of the grand style further shaped his perception of poetry. Ultimately, he saw poetry as a powerful medium capable of transcending the mundane and providing profound insights into the human condition.
Note:  
1. Arnold’s most famous piece of literary criticism is his essay “The Study of Poetry.”
2. The essay was originally published as the introduction to T. H. Ward’s anthology, The English Poets (1880).
3. It appeared later in Essays in Criticism, Second Series.

Comments

Recent Posts

Popular posts from this blog

Dr. Samuel Johnson's "Preface to Shakespeare": Points to Remember

Milton's Use of Epic Simile in "Paradise Lost", Book-I

Dr. West’s New Method of Teaching English :Its Merits and Demerits